Health Care & Public Safety Town Hall

September 7th, 2011
.


 

Website: http://www.assembly.ca.gov/Davis

Put America Back To Work!

September 1st, 2011

Go to www.aflcio.org and sign the pledge or text to “pledge” to 235246


 

Re-Districtricting Bill On Its Way to Senate

August 17th, 2011

California State Assembly Member Mike Davis

AB 420-Redistricting is on its way to the Senate floor. After summer recess Assemblyman Mike Davis will present his bill to the full Senate for approval as early as next week.

Sacramento – July 11, 2011- Assemblymember Mike Davis (D-Los Angeles) today presented his AB 420-Redistricting measure to the Senate Appropriations Committee. “This bill seeks to end prison-based gerrymandering by changing the way California’s inmates are counted for redistricting purposes,” Assemblyman Davis said. “Under California Election Code Section 2025, incarcerated individuals do not obtain legal residence in a particular district by being confined there, instead they retain their last known legal residence. Prison-based gerrymandering unfairly dilutes the voting strength of communities of color, which are disproportionately impacted by current incarceration statistics.”

Click on the link for more from Assemblyman Davis…

Assemblymember Davis Presents AB 420/Redistricting Measure

We invite you to continue your support by posting this link on your organizations website. Constituents that would like to send letters of support, please send to: Assemblyman Mike Davis, 700 State Drive (Admin. West), Los Angeles, California 90037 or fax to 213-744-2122.

¡Economista Del Año!

August 17th, 2011

orestez.jpg


 

They’re Even Talking About US Across The Water!

August 16th, 2011

A Midsummer Night’s Dream Obama has sold out the working class

Wednesday 10 August 2011
Phil Amadon

The passage of the debt ceiling Bill marks a dangerous moment for the workers’ movement in the US.

As Vermont’s Independent Senator Bernie Sanders has so clearly pointed out, this “debt ceiling compromise” is in fact a sweeping victory for the wealthy, the largest corporations and banks and the ultra-right.

There is nothing in it for working people that is worth the terrible price being paid. It locks the US into austerity, cuts and no new revenue.

It allegedly preserves social security, which the Democratic leadership and the White House should never have even allowed on the table, as it does not contribute to the deficit in a real way.

Whatever issue there is with social security could easily be fixed by raising social security taxes on higher incomes.

Medicare is allegedly secure from cuts but only if the “Debt Ceiling Committee of 12″ – the special bipartisan joint committee of Congress – can find enough extra cuts to prevent the automatic, across-the-board cuts to everything provided for in the debt ceiling Bill.

If this were a union-negotiated deal, it would clearly be a “sell-out” of the rank-and-file workers.

If this were a union struggle it would be time to organise a rank-and-file committee to wrest leadership of the struggle from those who sold us out, without undermining the union.

It is true that the right wing of the capitalist class is the originator and big winner in this struggle.

What is also true and crucial is that in the class war the US is locked into now, this loss is even more important than all the individual union struggles put together and so betrayal of the rank and file in this debt ceiling struggle is more serious than in any single unsavoury contract negotiation.

Most rank-and-file activists I know see no alternative to the president and his party in 2012 to defeat their howling enemies of the ultra-right and the Republicans – the “vanguard party of the capitalist class.”

In the winner-take-all arena of US politics it is true that the president and his party are the only ones capable of defeating the ultra-right and the Republicans so they are the only realistic choice in the voting booth in 2012.

It is also true that the president and his party are governing in a way that is discouraging and angering multitudes of his working-class supporters.

The sense of betrayal is strong in many quarters.

The possibility of defeat at the hands of the “stay-at-home voter” is stronger now than before. When it comes to voting, people are more inspired by hope for change than disgust with Tea Party lunacy.

The president and his party allowed the debt conversation to dominate the political conversation rather than a job-creating stimulus.

They essentially took the struggle for stimulus off the table in a serious way and so locked the US into a low growth, jobless austerity.

The US working class can no longer allow the Democratic Party and its leaders to set the agenda for the struggle against the ultra-right.

Conciliation, compromise, bipartisanship with these ruthless Republicans is absolutely senseless. The workers’ movement needs to stir up street heat, “Wisconsin-style” times 10.

In the realm of the political discourse the attitude of meeting the Republicans head on must be intensified, focussing on defeating them rather than conciliating them, both politically and ideologically. US workers can trust no-one outside the labour movement to do this for them.

Support Grows for Verizon Strikers

August 16th, 2011

Support Grows for Striking Verizon Workers’ Fight for Middle-Class Jobs

by Mike Hall, Aug 15, 2011

Photo credit: Scott Reynolds

The huge crowd outside the Verizon Center in downtown Washington, D.C., Saturday wasn’t there for a basketball game or concert. They came to tell Verizon to stop its attack on middle-class jobs.

The Verizon Center demonstration and dozens and dozens of other actions at Verizon worksites and Verizon Wireless stores are part of the growing support for the 45,000 Communications Workers of America (CWA) and Electrical Workers (IBEW) members forced on strike by Verizon Aug. 6.

The company, with $32.5 billion in revenue in the past three years, is demanding $1 billion in concessions from workers, which amounts to $20,000 per Verizon worker per year. While talks resumed last week, those demands remain on the table. Says CWA Communications Director Candice Johnson:

If wealthy companies like Verizon can continue to cut working families’ pay and benefits, we will never have an economic recovery in this country. This is a fight for all middle-class working families.

 

Verizon’s demands include outsourcing jobs overseas, gutting pension security, eliminating benefits for workers injured on the job, eliminating job security, slashing paid sick leave and raising health care costs.

CWA filed unfair labor practice charges against Verizon Aug. 12 with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), charging the company with refusal to bargain in good faith.

Union workers and community allies are joining striking CWA and IBEW members on the picket lines. Barbara Smith of CWA Local 1109 In Brooklyn, N.Y., told Labor Notes that when Verizon Wireless pickets are up:

pedestrians stop and thank us because they understand that this fight is about more than Verizon.

While Verizon is demanding that workers take home less, it paid its top five executives more than $258 million over the past four years, including $80.8 million for its former CEO Ivan Seidenberg. Friday night, more than 500 CWA, IBEW members and their allies held a candlelight vigil outside Seidenberg’ West Nyack, N.Y., home.

They carried a coffin to symbolize the death of the middle class. CWA Local 1101 member Ron Canterino, told reporters:

The middle class is dying here, and we’re here to be together as one class, one people—whether it’s union or nonunion working people.

Here are some other actions you can take to support the strikers:

  • Find a local picket line to support here.
  • Download leaflets here.
  • “Like” the strikers on Facebook here and change your Facebook and/or Twitter profile picture in solidarity here.
  • Click here to demand that Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam value employees’ work and share his corporation’s success with those who make it possible.
  • Click here to sign and Tweet an act.ly petition demanding Verizon drop its outrageous concessionary demands.
  • To Tweet about the strike, use the hashtag #verizonstrike and feel free to direct to @VZLaborfacts.


     

New LADWP Solar Energy Program

August 2nd, 2011

Neighborhood News and Information Alert

LADWP to Relaunch Solar Incentive Program with Revised Incentive Levels and Streamlined Customer Service

Applications Will Be Accepted Starting Sept. 1, 2011, 10:00 AM FY 2011-12 Budget Expanded to $60 Million

Under a plan approved by the Board of Water and Power Commissioners today, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) will relaunch its Solar Incentive Program (SIP) next month with double the budget for the next three years, a faster and more transparent customer experience, and revised incentive levels that are more in line with market pricing and allow greater participation. LADWP will resume accepting applications for solar incentives starting Sept. 1, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.

The new SIP guidelines incorporate public input received during workshops last month. The program had been placed on temporary hold April 9, as the demand for incentives was far outpacing the available budget by about 3 to 1. The suspension was initiated to catch up with a backlog of applications and solar inspections; increase customer education to address safety concerns; gain input on improving the program; and identify alternative financing options.

“As we re-launch the Solar Incentive Program in September, it is extremely important that we leverage the incentives to achieve the most solar power and encourage as much customer participation as possible. We also want to grow solar at a steady and sustainable pace while being prudent about the cost to all customers who pay for this program through their rates,” said LADWP General Manager Ronald O. Nichols.

Mr. Nichols has also asked staff to investigate more options for making solar affordable to low income customers. “We need to do more to make solar accessible to customers of all income levels. In the next few months we will come back with more leasing options and other proposals for lower income households,” he said.

Under SB 1, the state’s “Million Solar Roofs” legislation established a goal of 280 megawatts and mandated that LADWP spend $313 million through the end of 2016 for solar photovoltaic incentives. “We are committed to spending the full $313 million for customer incentives and achieving as much solar as possible with that level of funding,” Mr. Nichols said.

“One of the biggest dilemmas we have faced in this program is setting the incentive level to make the program more attractive to customers since our power rates were, and continue to be, much lower than those of the state’s other major utilities,” notes Aram Benyamin, Senior Assistant General Manager – Power.  The paradox is that offering higher incentive levels made less money available for more customers to install solar systems.

“Now that significant tax incentives are being offered by the federal government, we have an opportunity to reduce our incentive levels to be more in line with market pricing, which should give more customers the opportunity to build solar and increase the amount of solar PV that can be built through this program,” Mr. Benyamin said.

Under the guidelines approved Tuesday, the incentive levels were revised to be consistent with the California Solar Initiative, which is better aligned with existing solar markets and achieves a reasonable payback period for customers. LADWP will continue to offer the option of assigning the “REC” (Renewable Energy Credit) to LADWP and receiving an additional $0.40 per watt—which makes the incentive significantly higher than the state minimum.

Also to encourage more solar and benefit more customers, LADWP has increased the budget for incentive payments to $60 million in the current fiscal year and anticipates requesting an additional $60 million per year in each of the next two fiscal years.  This is made possible by using long-term bond financing to lower the program’s annual budget impact.  The higher budget for incentives allows more solar to be built faster.

Under the revised program, LADWP will suspend the program when new reservations reach the $40 million level until the next fiscal year.  This will ensure the program stays on a steady pace, within its annual budget, while allowing applications already approved and in the pipeline to proceed.

Since the program began in August 2006, LADWP customers have installed 35 MW under SB 1 and the Department expects that an additional 25 MW will be installed during the current fiscal year. An additional 35 MW in confirmed incentives is reserved and pending installation by customers and their installers for a program total of 95 MW of installed and pending Solar PV in the City.

The revamped program will utilize an online, automated application tool, “PowerClerk,” designed to streamline the customer experience and increase transparency of the process. “A customer will register and apply for the incentive online, then be able to track their application throughout the entire process,” said Mr. Benyamin said. “At any given time, the customer will know where they stand in the process.”

The revised guidelines were modified to address comments received from over 400 people who participated in a series of outreach meetings conducted last month. Many of the comments focused on the need for a more transparent and sustainable program. Participants also commented on some of the specific proposals, such as an annual reservation limit of $40 million per year, requiring proof of a building permit prior to submitting the application, the lowered incentives levels, and lowering the incentive levels for leased residential systems to match those for commercial systems.

In response, LADWP revised the proposed guidelines to create more transparency and more flexibility, including:

The new guidelines set an annual reservation limit of $40 million per year. To address concerns, LADWP will provide frequent online updates to show the running total of reservation requests so that installers and customers will be able to monitor reservation requests.

Participants will have up to 60 days after receiving a confirmation on their solar incentive reservations to submit their building permit and also have the ability to request an extension.

LADWP will monitor the incentive levels and modify them if participation dips too low.

The incentive levels for leased residential systems will be lowered to match those for commercial systems. Officials said this change is appropriate because leased systems benefit from a federal tax allowance for an accelerated depreciation of a solar installation. Purchased residential or governmental systems cannot take advantage of accelerated depreciation.

LADWP also modified proposed measures to address installers and customers activating their systems prior to LADWP inspection and approval.

For further information and to view the revised SIP guidelines, please visit www.ladwp.com/solar.


 


 

Six Ways to Improve the Economy

August 1st, 2011

United Steelworkers Report Offers Six Ways To Build A Progressive Economy

A new report spearheaded by the United Steelworkers and the New America Foundation lays out a commonsense plan for fixing the economy.
July 29, 2011
By Eric Loomis

 

We all know the economy is a disaster. Globalization and free market capitalism have created long-term unemployment, a political climate poisoned against progressive taxation, and a general unwillingness to tackle the structural problems facing the United States. The Republican Party exists to further the interest of the mega-rich while much of the Democratic Party follows suit. Meanwhile, the standard of living of average Americans declines.

With the lack of real leadership from Washington, we need progressives to stand up and offer meaningful policy solutions to reshape the debate. Led by Leo Hindery, chair of the Smart Globalization Initiative at the New America Foundation and Leo W. Girard, president of the United Steelworkers, the Task Force on Job Creation has released a report providing an excellent framework for revitalizing the American economy.

Entitled “A Vision for Economic Renewal: An American Jobs Agenda,” the report argues, “Our national leadership is responsible for tackling such crises, and President Obama has shown a willingness to reform health care and regulate the financial services industries. Today our nation needs that same passion and commitment directed at job creation.” It then presents a six-point plan with short- and long-term policy proposals. By and large, these are sensible ideas that, should we follow them, would bring America back from the brink of disaster.

1. Manufacturing

Noting, “Manufacturing is essential for our nation’s economic recovery and long-term health,” the report suggests three immediate goals. First, the government should focus on domestic procurement, buying goods with at least 75 percent of the content made within U.S. borders. Second, it would spur domestic manufacturing with a 10 percent investment tax credit for renovating manufacturing facilities. Third, it would require those bidding for government contracts to file Employment Impact Statements that would factor into winning those contracts. In the longer-term, it asks President Obama to create a new Works Progress Administration-like program that would directly employee Americans to rebuild the American economy, create a President’s Council on Manufacturing Policy, and promote research and development in new technologies.

These ideas strike at the heart of the economic crisis: national policy currently encourages cutting workforces and sending jobs overseas through corporate tax breaks for companies investing overseas rather than creating jobs in the U.S. We cannot put the economy back together again unless we have people making things in America. Manufacturing work has an essential role to play in any successful economic recovery package. Without it, we will continue with our rapidly growing income inequality problems. The report’s recommendations provide a valuable starting point for dealing with these problems.

2. Trade and Globalization

Rightfully noting globalization is undermining the American economy through the rapid acceleration of outsourcing American jobs and decimating labor and environmental standards around the world, the report urges President Obama to eliminate tax incentives that rewards corporations for outsourcing jobs overseas, promote producing military goods at home, enact temporary tariffs that would allow the nation to deal with trade deficits without violating trade agreements, and create a new division within the Justice Department to enforce trade agreements. Long-term goals include government promotion of vocational and technical training and developing strategies for technology-based planning that would provide national control for technologies key to future consumer needs.

Again, the report provides a fine road map for battling against the worst aspects of globalization while also encouraging business-friendly policies such as tax reforms that could convince them to keep jobs in the United States. Given the enormous military-industrial complex, the report’s emphasis on spurring domestic defense manufacturing makes a great deal of sense; no other sector could put so many people to work so quickly. I am nervous about embracing military spending as the solution to any crisis. But if our goal is to put Americans back to work, it is better to employ Americans in defense production than shipping the jobs overseas and leaving many young Americans with no choice other than joining the military. Reforming America’s relationship with globalization would be fraught with problems. No nation did more to promote it and no nation’s capitalists have benefited more. But if we are going to deal with its employment problem, redefining our relationship with globalization must happen.

3. U.S.-China Trade

The report paints China as a nation declaring war on the American way of life through its hostile economic policies and secretive political institutions. It seeks to undermine China’s growing influence in the world in several ways. First, the U.S. should place pressure on China to reform its currency devaluation, a major reason it has attracted so many manufacturing jobs. Second, China needs to respect intellectual property rights and engage in more transparent practices in trade policy. If China resists these demands, the report encourages the government to bring World Trade Organization suits against it.

This seems the most difficult part of the report to implement. American corporations are deeply enmeshed in China. They have little discomfort with its lack of democracy. Corporations find that dictatorial regimes are often better for business—no tricky labor unions, populist movements, or environmental regulations. Corporate investment in China has not resulted in greater freedom for the Chinese or American people. China’s devalued currency has led to massive corporate profits at the expense of American workers. Increased Chinese investment in the United States and its growing sphere of influence in the developing world make it a major threat to U.S. interests in coming years, but for these very reasons create a situation difficult for American policymakers to resist. However, recognizing the very real role the Chinese government has in undermining American employment is important and should be a major part of our foreign policy toward that nation.

4. Infrastructure Crisis

The report points to the nation’s crumbling infrastructure as a major source of potential jobs. Physical infrastructure such as bridges and roads are falling apart while the nation lags behind in building infrastructure for broadband service and other new technologies. The report urges policymakers to create a National Infrastructure Bank, which Senator John Kerry and Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro have proposed. This would be an independent institution dedicated to providing bonds and loans for infrastructure projects. In the longer term, the report suggests federal guarantees on municipal bonds for infrastructure and the creation of a White House Office of Infrastructure Investment.

I thought the I-35 bridge collapse in Minnesota would make Americans serious about rebuilding its infrastructure. Alas, Americans have short memories and the Tea Party-inspired anti-government fervor that has overtaken Washington and many state capitols undermined legislative action to invest in infrastructure. Perhaps it will take another deadly disaster to wake us up, but I’m skeptical. However, the report correctly identifies this as a both a national crisis and a way to stimulate employment. These are superb ideas. A nation with serious politicians would listen to these recommendations. Unfortunately, we live in the United States in 2011.

5. Jobs in the Green Economy

The report notes that “we lack a comprehensive policy of clean energy and economic development,” and that given the problems of limited fuel sources and climate change, the government needs to prioritize creating a green economy. It calls on the government to extend grants and expand tax credits and loan guarantees for renewable energy production. In the long run, it urges a sped up process for approving green energy manufacturing.

President Obama tried to center green jobs in the early months of his administration, but had to give it up in the face of Republican belligerence over every move he made. We do need heavy investment in green jobs, not only for the current economy, but also for the future stability of the Earth. That said, while I am supportive of speeding up the process of deciding on Environmental Impact Statements for green manufacturing, we need to make sure that green energy has a negligible negative effect on the land. Rushed regulatory agencies often make bad decisions. I’d like to be as sure as possible that a solar energy installation isn’t going to create localized pollution and that the chemicals used in the creation of solar panels are properly disposed. We need jobs, but also need safe and healthy human beings. The authors of the report know this, but it’s also important to slow down and build a green economy that is safe for the ecosystem and human bodies.

6. Youth Unemployment

Youth unemployment has skyrocketed during the economic crisis. The report explores connections between early unemployment and long-term poverty, noting, “young people who do not have a successful work experience by age 25 are at a greatly increased risk of lifelong poverty.” Even college graduates are in danger; those who have to take low-wage jobs early in their careers earn 30-40% less for life than average college graduates. The report urges the government to address this crisis by creating jobs programs for in-school youth, providing vouchers to stimulate demand for young workers, and extending the Work Opportunity Tax Credit.

I applaud the report for focusing on this serious problem. Millions of unemployed youth is a recipe for societal instability. During the Great Depression, young, unemployed men provided the shock troops for fascist regimes throughout Europe. In the United States, commentators of the day feared that the young and unemployed could take the U.S. toward either communism or fascism and fretted about both possibilities. Franklin Roosevelt, whose New Deal clearly inspired the report’s authors, recognized the potential destabilizing effects of angry young people with nothing to do and put them to work in the Civilian Conservation Corps, Works Progress Administration, and other federal agencies. If anything, I’d like to see the report call for even greater emphasis on employing the young through direct government employment.

Despite a few small quibbles, in particular over policy toward China and my hesitation about undermining regulatory agencies by pressuring them to speed up green infrastructure project approval, I find the Task Force on Job Creation report a compelling document that provides a clear roadmap for a rejuvenated American economy. Although nearly each of the recommended policies make a great deal of sense, many will prove difficult to enact in the poisoned atmosphere of Republican extremism. However, liberals need powerful voices pushing for sensible policies that steer this nation back to serving the masses rather than the fat-cat elite. The ideas in this report are a great start for any progressive politician or economist looking to get this nation on track.

I want to especially credit the Steelworkers for its involvement in this report. At its best, labor isn’t just fighting for the short-term interests of its members, but is at the forefront of a radical vision of social democracy that speaks truth about working-class lives to corporate and political power. Few if any American unions have done that so effectively over the past decade as the Steelworkers. This is leadership for the future, not only in this report, but also in labor and progressive politics more broadly.


 

New President in Peru

July 29th, 2011

Peru
8) New Peruvian president: Peru’s poor my priority
Frank Bajak, AP, July 28, 2011
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gxpNSDaJPzWQxs2qnFZI8taia84A

Lima, Peru – Ollanta Humala, the leftist military man who won Peru’s presidency after abandoning a radical platform, promised in his inaugural address Thursday to make his priority the one in three Peruvians still mired in poverty.

In an impassioned speech, the 49-year-old former army lieutenant colonel charted a plan for spreading the wealth from Peru’s mineral boom beyond Lima, where it has long been concentrated among a small elite, to long-neglected hinterlands.

“Peru’s peasants and the poor in the countryside in general will be the priority,” Humala said in remarks before a newly installed Congress and dignitaries who included 11 presidents, almost all from South America.
[...]
The pledges include guaranteeing old-age pensions for all Peruvians at age 65; raising the minimum monthly wage to $270 by next year; and building hospitals in 50 cities where they’re lacking.

The president also has promised to invest more in public transportation in the traffic-choked capital of Lima; to expand highways and railways; to rebuild Peru’s merchant marine, and to re-establish a national airline. Aeroperu went bankrupt in 1999.

He also said he would dedicate more natural gas from the Camisea field for domestic use rather than export, and has promised to lower natural gas prices, although he wouldn’t offer a target price Thursday.

Humala won’t have an easy time in Congress, where his party has just 47 of 130 seats and will have to depend on lawmakers from the Peru Posible party of former President Alejandro Toledo for a majority.
[...]
The World Bank says that in Peru’s rural highlands, where support for Humala was strongest, the poverty rate is as high as 66 percent. Humala won more than 70 percent of the vote in several highland states in the June 5 election.

(from Just Foregin Policy)


 

Support Your Local Grocery Worker!

July 29th, 2011